› where the applicant applies to this Court for a statutory order of review of the respondent’s decision to refuse her an extension of time
› where the applicant submits the respondent failed to take into account considerations relevant to whether “special circumstances” existed
› whether the respondent failed to take into account relevant considerations
Administrative Law
› JUDICIAL REVIEW
› GROUNDS OF REVIEW
› OTHER CASES
› where the applicant applies to this Court for a statutory order of review of the respondent’s decision to refuse her an extension of time
› where the applicant submits the respondent, in reaching its decision, exercised a discretionary power in accordance with a rule or policy without regard to the merit of the case
› whether the respondent had regard to the merits of the case in reaching its decision
Administrative Law
› JUDICIAL REVIEW
› GROUNDS OF REVIEW
› ERROR OF LAW
› where the applicant applies to this Court for a statutory order of review of the respondent’s decision to refuse her an extension of time
› where the applicant submits the respondent’s decision involved an error of law by failing to apply the correct statutory test
› whether the respondent’s decision involved an error of law
Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (Qld), s 542
Case Details
Citation[2016] QSC 311
CourtQSC
JurisdictionQueensland
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.
