Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v H, C S [2016] SADC 23 — [166] & Yeah. — Barrister AI

R v H, C S

[2016] SADC 23

District Court of South Australia

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. [166]
1. You said yesterday in your evidence you knew that (the complainant) wouldn’t say no to a boy, is that right.
1. Yeah.
1. Yes.

Case Details

Citation[2016] SADC 23

CourtSADC

JurisdictionSouth Australia

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by3

2021Helps v The Queen (No 3)SASCFC 10
2019R v HelpsSASCFC 66
2016R v HelpsSASCFC 154

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works