A trial judge's summing up on intoxication in a murder trial is not deficient merely because it does not separately detail the specific ways intoxication evidence bears on the specific intent element (element 3) as distinct from the deliberateness element (element 2), provided the judge repeatedly directs the jury that intoxication is relevant to both elements, accurately summarises the pharmacological evidence, and the evidence and directions taken as a whole make the jury's task clear. In a suicide-by-collision case, deliberate driving into oncoming traffic with suicidal intent will, as a practical matter, also establish advertence to the probability of grievous bodily harm to the occupants of the other vehicle.
The full text is available to signed-in members.