In disciplinary proceedings before the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal, the general principle that costs follow the event applies as a starting point, but the public interest element of such proceedings is a relevant consideration that may warrant departure from that principle. Where a legal practitioner employed in a largely administrative role considers legal issues (such as statutory confidentiality provisions and privilege) in performing a task connected to other aspects of their work that involve legal practice, they are acting in the course of, or in connection with, their practice of the law. A mistaken but genuine and considered view of the law, formed in good faith and in conformity with established practice, does not constitute unprofessional or unsatisfactory conduct.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.
4 of the 4 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.