Streets v Tasmania [2016] TASCCA 13 — Appeal And New Trial — Barrister AI
← Back
Streets v Tasmania
[2016] TASCCA 13
Court of Criminal Appeal of Tasmania
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Criminal Law
›
Appeal and new trial
›
Appeal against sentence
›
Grounds for interference
›
Sentence manifestly excessive or inadequate
›
Appellants alleging sentence manifestly excessive
›
Pleaded guilty to two counts of aggravated armed robbery
›
Two robberies of same pharmacy using knife
›
Sentence of 5 years' imprisonment with parole eligibility after half not manifestly excessive.
Criminal Code (Tas), s 402(4).
Aust Dig Criminal Law [3521]
Case Details
Citation
[2016] TASCCA 13
Court
TASCCA
Jurisdiction
Tasmania
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2016] TASCCA 13
17 authorities it relies on
1993
1998
2003
2008
2013
2016
Relies on
17
2015
The Queen v Pham
HCA 39
2013
Munda v Western Australia
HCA 38
2011
Belbin v Bennett
TASSC 23
2010
Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa
NSWCCA 194
and 13 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
