Ryan v Ryan [2016] TASSC 4 — Equitable Estoppel & Relief — Barrister AI
← Back
Ryan v Ryan
[2016] TASSC 4
Supreme Court of Tasmania
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Estoppel
›
Equitable estoppel
›
Proprietary estoppel
›
Where promisor made representations to give property to promisee
›
Whether promisee acted to his detriment in reliance on promisor's representations.
Equity
›
Relief
›
Whether relief measured by reference to value of representations
›
Where equitable compensation is the appropriate measure of relief.
Sidhu v Van Dyke [2014] HCA 19; Van Dyke v Sidhu [2013] NSWCA 198; Giumelli v Giumelli [1999] HCA 10, applied.
Aust Dig Estoppel [1048]
Case Details
Citation
[2016] TASSC 4
Court
TASSC
Jurisdiction
Tasmania
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2016] TASSC 4
3 authorities it relies on
1999
2002
2005
2008
2011
2014
2016
Relies on
3
2014
Sidhu v Van Dyke
HCA 19
2013
Van Dyke v Sidhu
NSWCA 198
1999
Giumelli v Giumelli
HCA 10
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works