RKF v Scott [2016] TASSC 42 — Appeal And Review & Aust Dig Magistrates [1348] — Barrister AI
← Back
RKF v Scott
[2016] TASSC 42
Supreme Court of Tasmania
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Magistrates
›
Appeal and review
›
Tasmania
›
Motion to review
›
Procedure and evidence
›
Obligation to provide sufficient reasons for decision
›
Duty to deal with counsel's submissions.
Aust Dig Magistrates [1348]
Australian Securities Commission v Schreuder A79/1994; James v Eyles [2007] TASSC 55, applied.
Case Details
Citation
[2016] TASSC 42
Court
TASSC
Jurisdiction
Tasmania
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2016] TASSC 42
3 authorities it relies on
1987
1993
1999
2005
2011
2016
Relies on
3
2007
James v Eyles
TASSC 55
1998
R v Arnold
VSCA 34
and 1 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
