Dennis v Dennis

[2016] TASSC 62

Supreme Court of Tasmania

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Estoppel
2. › Equitable estoppel
3. › Proprietary estoppel
4. › Where promisor made representations to promisee as to the forgiveness of debt
5. › Whether promisee acted to his detriment in reliance on promisor's representations.
1. Sidhu v Van Dyke [2014] HCA 19, 251 CLR 505; Crown Melbourne Limited v Cosmopolitan Hotel (Vic) Pty Ltd [2016] HCA 26, 333 ALR 384; Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher [1988] HCA 7; (1988) 164 CLR 387, referred to.
1. Aust Dig Estoppel [1048]
1. Succession
2. › Contracts to leave property by will
3. › Generally
4. › What amounts to contract
5. › Evidence of agreement.