Raper v Bowden [2016] TASSC 9 — Procedure & Aust Dig Procedure [1343] — Barrister AI
← Back
Raper v Bowden
[2016] TASSC 9
Supreme Court of Tasmania
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Procedure
›
Civil Proceedings in State and Territory Courts
›
Separate Decision or Determination of Questions and Consolidation of Proceedings
›
Separate Decision or Determination of Liability and Damages
›
Personal injury matter
›
Order to be made only in clear cases
›
Application refused.
Supreme Court Rules 2000 (Tas), r 559(1)(b).
Aust Dig Procedure [1343]
Case Details
Citation
[2016] TASSC 9
Court
TASSC
Jurisdiction
Tasmania
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2016] TASSC 9
3 authorities it relies on
1998
2002
2006
2010
2016
Relies on
3
2001
Tepko Pty Ltd v Water Board
HCA 19
2000
Idoport Pty Ltd and Anor v National Australia Bank Ltd and 8 Ors; Idoport Pty Ltd and Market Holdings Pty Ltd v Donald Robert Argus; Idoport Pty Ltd "JMG" v National Australia Bank Ltd
NSWSC 1215
1998
Arnott, Diana Margaret v O'Leary, Ronald Selwyn
TASSC 15
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
