A medical panel's reasons are adequate where, read as a whole, they implicitly disclose the panel's treatment of uncertain or equivocal evidence and state the actual path of reasoning by which the panel arrived at its opinion. A panel is not required to expressly address and reject every piece of evidence, particularly where the evidence is uncertain, vestigial, or inconsistent with the case as put by the party's own submissions.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.