Forensic disadvantage arising from the passage of time in cold cases involving DNA evidence — including gaps in continuity of custody of samples, loss of original exhibits, and inability of forensic witnesses to recall events — does not without more justify a permanent stay where the disadvantage is capable of remedy by cross-examination, submissions, and appropriate judicial directions. The stay question may need to be revisited if evidentiary rulings significantly alter the prosecution case.
The full text is available to signed-in members.