The use of the September 11 World Trade Centre attacks as an example to illustrate memory retention was held to be an unfortunate but not prejudicial choice in a trial involving a Muslim accused, where the trial judge gave adequate directions about the impermissible use of evidence concerning the accused's religion. A single inadvertent slip in a jury direction (saying 'truer' instead of 'true') does not occasion a miscarriage of justice where the direction as a whole clearly conveys the correct standard of proof.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.