A prisoner's confession claiming responsibility for offences of which others have been convicted will not constitute cogent fresh evidence where the confession contains implausibilities, the confessor lacks credibility, details appear tailored to known facts, and the confession cannot be reconciled with the strong prosecution evidence at trial. The fact that a confessor is already serving a life sentence and would face no additional head sentence is a relevant consideration in assessing credibility.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 2 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.