A fact-specific decision on security for costs and vacation/stay applications in the context of appeals from interlocutory orders. The court confirmed that pending proceedings in other courts that are in their infancy do not provide a proper basis for staying appeals or vacating hearings of security for costs applications. The existence of outstanding unpaid costs orders, encumbered assets, and the interlocutory nature of decisions requiring leave to appeal supported the grant of security.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.