Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Glanville v Harris [2017] ACTSC 110 — Criminal Law & Discretionary Trusts — Barrister AI

Glanville v Harris

[2017] ACTSC 110

Supreme Court of the ACT10 May 2017

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Appeal
2. › CRIMINAL LAW
3. › Appeal from Magistrates Court
4. › appeal against findings of guilt
5. › appeal that findings of guilt were unsafe and unsatisfactory
6. › theft
7. › appropriation of property
8. › false accounting
9. › elements of the offence of theft
10. › reckless
11. › “accounting document”
12. › intention to permanently deprive
13. › s 350 of the Criminal Code Act 2002 (ACT)
1. Trusts
2. › DISCRETIONARY TRUSTS
3. › Powers of the trustee
4. › consent
5. › “right to enforce the trust”
6. › in personam right
7. › chose in action
8. › intention to defeat the trust
9. › reckless as to the intent to defeat the trust
10. › intention to permanently deprive
11. › transactions had no relationship to the object of the trust
1. s 305(2) of the Criminal Code Act 2002 (ACT)

Case Details

Citation[2017] ACTSC 110

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date10 May 2017

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by6

2018BI v MossACTSC 278
2018Corkhill v Commonwealth of Australia (No 3)ACTSC 87
2017Kalis v NewACTSC 334
2017Parkinson v AlexanderACTSC 201
and 2 more after sign-in

Relies on39

2016Lancaster v HydeACTSC 50
2015Preston v CarnallACTSC 325
2015R v RouxACTSC 307
2015DPP v Brownlie & Brownlie (a pseudonym)VSCA 147
and 35 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works