Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Mohamed & Anor v Adrija Pty Ltd [2017] ACTSC 158 — Civil Law & Building Contract — Barrister AI

Mohamed & Anor v Adrija Pty Ltd

[2017] ACTSC 158

Supreme Court of the ACT21 June 2017

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Appeal
2. › CIVIL LAW
3. › Appeal from the Magistrates Court
4. › appeal against decision finding termination of contract lawful
5. › appeal against damages arising from termination of contract
6. › Magistrate erred in finding breach notice valid
7. › substantive issues still requiring determination at first instance
8. › matter in part remitted to the Magistrates Court
1. Contract
2. › BUILDING CONTRACT
3. › Termination of contract
4. › whether failure to make payment at certain stage of contract entitles termination of the contract
5. › validity of breach notice
6. › Magistrate erred in not making any determination as the validity of the subsequent breach notices

Case Details

Citation[2017] ACTSC 158

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date21 June 2017

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Cited by1

2022Mohamed v Adrija Pty Ltd (No 2)ACTSC 89

Relies on2

2015Maples Winterview Pty Ltd v Liu & AnorACTSC 58
2012Cardona & Anor v Brown & AnorVSCA 174

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works