Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Eastman (No 18) [2017] ACTSC 180 — Jurisdiction, Practice And — Barrister AI

R v Eastman (No 18)

[2017] ACTSC 180

Supreme Court of the ACT26 July 2017

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law - Jurisdiction, Practice and
1. PROCEDURE - Subpoenas - public interest immunity
2. › production of documents in response to subpoena - claims to non disclosure of information in documents on ground of public interest immunity - protection of informers - objection to disclosure on public interest immunity ground upheld in part

Case Details

Citation[2017] ACTSC 180

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date26 July 2017

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Cited by1

2020DPP (Cth) v Brookman (Ruling No 4 - AFP PII)VSC 818

Relies on5

2017R v Eastman (No 14)ACTSC 66
2016Eastman v Director of Public Prosecutions (No 13)ACTCA 65
2001Attorney General v Kaddour & TurkmaniNSWCCA 456
1978Sankey v WhitlamHCA 43
and 1 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works