Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Xh [2017] ACTSC 236 — Interpretation — Barrister AI

R v Xh

[2017] ACTSC 236

Supreme Court of the ACT18 August 2017

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Interpretation
2. › General Rules of Construction of Instruments
3. › meaning to be given to “in part” in s 65(2) of the Crime (Sentence Administration) Act 2005 (ACT)
4. › proper approach to statutory interpretation
5. › every word to be given meaning
6. › obligation to interpret provision consistently with purpose of Act and Human Rights Act 2004 (ACT).

Case Details

Citation[2017] ACTSC 236

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date18 August 2017

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Cited by1

2022R v Du (No 5)ACTSC 172

Relies on1

1998Project Blue Sky v ABAHCA 28

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works