R v Eastman (No 22) [2017] ACTSC 256 — Criminal Law & Jurisdiction, Practice And Procedure — Barrister AI
← Back
R v Eastman (No 22)
[2017] ACTSC 256
Supreme Court of the ACT
7 September 2017
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+3 more
Criminal Law
Jurisdiction, Practice and Procedure
Legal Professional Privilege
Claim by accused that prosecution has had access to privileged communications
Case Details
Citation
[2017] ACTSC 256
Court
ACTSC
Jurisdiction
Australian Capital Territory
Decision Date
7 September 2017
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2017] ACTSC 256
21 authorities it relies on
1976
1984
1992
2000
2008
2017
Relies on
21
2015
Hutchins v Cap Coast Telecoms Pty Ltd (in liq), in the matter of Cap Coast Telecoms Pty Ltd (in liq) ACN 128 716 030 (No 2)
FCA 946
2015
R v Seller; R v McCarthy
NSWCCA 76
2014
Dealer Support Services Pty Ltd v Motor Trades Association of Australia Ltd
FCA 1065
2014
Lee v The Queen; Lee v The Queen
HCA 20
and 17 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
