Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Graham [2017] ACTSC 267 — Jurisdiction, Practice And Procedure — Barrister AI

R v Graham

[2017] ACTSC 267

Supreme Court of the ACT15 September 2017

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
3. › Trial
4. › trial by judge alone
5. › verdict
6. › hindering a public official
7. › common assault
8. › failure to wear a helmet
9. › failure to stop vehicle when requested by police
10. › failure to stop vehicle when signalled by police
11. › driving on a path
12. › riding a motor vehicle without consent
13. › unlicensed rider
14. › failure to stop after an accident causing injury
15. › aggravated dangerous driving

Case Details

Citation[2017] ACTSC 267

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date15 September 2017

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by2

2018R v JohnstoneACTSC 316
and 1 more after sign-in

Relies on9

2016R v Connors (No 2)ACTSC 333
2016McElholum v HughesACTCA 37
2015Pangallo v Smith and Insurance Australia Limited trading as NRMA InsuranceACTSC 313
2015McElholum v HughesACTSC 78
and 5 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works