Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v McMahon (No 2) [2017] ACTSC 299 — Law Reform — Barrister AI

R v McMahon (No 2)

[2017] ACTSC 299

Supreme Court of the ACT9 October 2017

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Statutes
2. › LAW REFORM
3. › Transfer of charges
4. › charges bearing a relevant connection
5. › breach of bail
6. › jurisdiction of the Court to deal with an accused who fails to accord to their bail undertaking
7. › s 90B of the Magistrates Court Act 1930 (ACT)

Case Details

Citation[2017] ACTSC 299

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date9 October 2017

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 11 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by11

2022R v Connors (No 3)ACTSC 391
2022R v Bower (No 2)ACTSC 388
2022R v WatsonACTSC 95
2022R v SubasicACTSC 380
and 7 more after sign-in

Relies on27

2017Parkinson v Alexander (No 2)ACTSC 290
2017R v Forrest (No 3)ACTSC 168
2016R v Klobucar (No 4)ACTSC 348
2016Short v The QueenVSCA 210
and 23 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works