Scald v Bowyer

[2017] ACTSC 309

Supreme Court of the ACT25 October 2017

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Negligence
2. › whether representation was made negligently
3. › alleged lost opportunity
4. › duty to take reasonable care
5. › whether duty was breached
1. Limitation of Actions
2. › commencement of limitation period
3. › prima statute barred
4. › Limitation Act 1985 (ACT) s 33(1)
5. › where alleged deliberate concealment to fact relevant to cause of action
6. › the fact concealed must be a fact which should be pleaded in a Statement of Claim
7. › plaintiff alleged the fact was flawed
8. › whether Limitation Act 1985 (ACT) s 33(3) applied
9. › inconsistency in argument regarding representation

Citation[2017] ACTSC 309

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date25 October 2017

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in