← Back
R v Hart
[2017] ACTSC 319
Supreme Court of the ACT
19 October 2017
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Statutes
›
Acts of Parliament
›
Interpretation
›
Crimes (Sentencing) Act 2005 (ACT)
›
suspended sentence
›
good behaviour order required for “the period during which the sentence is suspended or for any longer period”
›
period during which the sentence is suspended must be at least the length of the outstanding term of the sentence
›
no scope for serving a suspended sentence by good behaviour for less than the outstanding term of the sentence.
Case Details
Citation
[2017] ACTSC 319
Court
ACTSC
Jurisdiction
Australian Capital Territory
Decision Date
19 October 2017
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2017] ACTSC 319
1 authority it relies on
2016
2017
Relies on
1
2016
R v Hart
ACTSC 16
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
R v Hart [2017] ACTSC 319 — Acts Of Parliament — Barrister AI
