Laipato v Truman

[2017] ACTSC 351

Supreme Court of the ACT27 November 2017

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Criminal Law
1. Appeal Against Conviction
1. self-represented defendant
1. magistrate rules incorrectly about admissibility of questions asked in cross-examination

Citation[2017] ACTSC 351

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date27 November 2017

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

Already have an account? Sign in