Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v No [2017] ACTSC 372 — Evidence & Particular Offences — Barrister AI

R v No

[2017] ACTSC 372

Supreme Court of the ACT

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › EVIDENCE
3. › Relevance
4. › Evidentiary Matters Relating to Witnesses and Accused Persons
5. › Complaints
6. › application to cross-examine complainant and accused on sexual history
7. › whether accused and complainant engaged in “rough sex”
8. › whether complainant’s use of dating website is inconsistent with claim of being “madly in love” with accused made to explain resumption of relationship after alleged violent rape
9. › whether leave is necessary
10. › leave given if required.
1. Criminal Law
2. › PARTICULAR OFFENCES
3. › Offences Against the Person
4. › Offences Against Decency and Morality
5. › sexual assault
6. › sexual intercourse without consent
7. › assault occasioning actual bodily harm
8. › act of indecency.

Case Details

Citation[2017] ACTSC 372

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by6

2024DPP v Smith (No 4)ACTSC 301
2024DPP v RazayeeACTSC 151
2023DPP v KnACTSC 243
2023DPP v AustinACTSC 185
and 2 more after sign-in

Relies on1

2009R v FernandoACTSC 137

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works