R v Will (No 3) [2017] ACTSC 395 — Miscellaneous Powers Of Court And Judges — Barrister AI
← Back
R v Will (No 3)
[2017] ACTSC 395
Supreme Court of the ACT
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Practice and Procedure
›
MISCELLANEOUS POWERS OF COURT AND JUDGES
›
Judgments and orders
›
non-publication orders and redactions to ensure a fair trial for the accused
Practice and Procedure
›
MISCELLANEOUS POWERS OF COURT AND JUDGES
›
amending orders
›
inherent power
›
slip rule
›
r 6906 of the Court Procedures Rules 2006 (ACT)
Practice and Procedure
›
MISCELLANEOUS POWERS OF COURT AND JUDGES
›
power to amend reasons
›
whether amendment of substance
›
addendum to be published with reasons
Case Details
Citation
[2017] ACTSC 395
Court
ACTSC
Jurisdiction
Australian Capital Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2017] ACTSC 395
12 authorities it relies on
1981
1988
1995
2002
2009
2017
Relies on
12
2017
R v Will (No 2)
ACTSC 377
2017
R v Will
ACTSC 356
2015
Esposito v Commonwealth of Australia
FCAFC 160
2015
Brennand and Naughton v Hartung and Best Practice Education Group Ltd t/as Blue Gum Community School (No 3)
ACTSC 149
and 8 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works