R v Thompson (No 3)

[2017] ACTSC 53

Supreme Court of the ACT

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Evidence
2. › JUDICIAL DISCRETION TO ADMIT OR EXCLUDE EVIDENCE
3. › Exclusion of improperly or illegally obtained evidence
4. › probative value of evidence
5. › importance of evidence in the proceedings
6. › gravity of the impropriety
7. › impropriety deliberate or reckless
8. › difficulty in obtaining the evidence without impropriety
9. › evidence in question not to be excluded
10. › s 138 of the Evidence Act 2011 (ACT)
1. Evidence
2. › JUDICIAL DISCRETION TO ADMIT OR EXCLUDE EVIDENCE
3. › Exclusion of prejudicial evidence
4. › mandatory exclusion
5. › issue raised in pre-trial application not addressed on appeal
6. › unfair prejudice
7. › directions recommended to trial judge to consider giving to the jury
8. › evidence allowed to be submitted
9. › s 137 of the Evidence Act 2011 (ACT)
1. Jurisdiction, Practice and Procedure
2. › WARRANTS, ARRESTS, SEARCH, SEIZURE AND INCIDENTIAL POWERS
3. › Search under the warrant invalid
4. › time warrant is in force
5. › specific decision required as to the period during which a warrant is to be in force
1. Administrative Law
2. › JUDICIAL REVIEW
3. › Search and seizure
4. › warrant
5. › whether execution of warrant unlawful
6. › warrant not in force when the search was conducted
7. › falso demonstration quae non nocet
8. › absence of the period of time warrant in force fatal
9. › s 194(5) of the Crimes Act 1900 (ACT)