Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Ayala v Poole (No 2) [2017] ACTSC 85 — General Principles — Barrister AI

Ayala v Poole (No 2)

[2017] ACTSC 85

Supreme Court of the ACT

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Appeal
2. › GENERAL PRINCIPLES
3. › Appeal from Magistrates Court
4. › appeal dismissed
5. › sentence confirmed
6. › re-sentencing
1. Criminal Law
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
3. › Judgment and punishment
4. › periodic detention
5. › periodic detention not available
6. › sentence related order
7. › order contrary to law
8. › sentence stayed
9. › “serving a sentence of imprisonment”
10. › re-open sentencing
11. › re-sentencing
1. Criminal Law
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
3. › Judgment and punishment
4. › re-sentencing
5. › common assault
6. › family violence matters
7. › mental health problems
8. › depression
9. › anxiety
10. › post traumatic stress disorder
11. › resistant to counselling or treatment
12. › alcohol use
13. › evidence from author of Court Duty Report
14. › not suitable for community service work
15. › finding of unsuitability overridden
16. › extend time to perform community service work
17. › sentence suspended
18. › Good Behaviour Order

Case Details

Citation[2017] ACTSC 85

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Relies on10

2016GW v The QueenACTCA 9
2016Ayala v PooleACTSC 63
2015Queen v Kekalainen (No 2)ACTSC 369
2015Hall v CL (No 2)ACTSC 294
and 6 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works