alleged breaches of ss 18, 29(1)(e), (f) and (g), 34 and 37 of the Australian Consumer Law
where alleged that the respondents represented that the respondents could teach consumers how to buy a house for $1, and/or without a deposit or a bank loan, and/or with little or none of the consumer’s money, and/or generate income and profit by dealing with property in various ways
Case Details
Citation[2017] FCA 915
CourtFCA
JurisdictionCommonwealth
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 19 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 19 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.
