Tribunal members who repeatedly interrupt applicants, misapprehend their evidence, and make unfounded accusations of evasiveness may give rise to apprehended bias, particularly where the cumulative effect of such conduct demonstrates a closed mind, and audio recordings of hearings may be used to assess tone of voice.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 26 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 26 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.