Practitioners dealing with self-represented litigants advancing 'sovereign citizen' or 'freeman on the land' style arguments (purported promissory notes, challenges to court jurisdiction, claims that signatures create value) can cite this case as authority that such arguments are hopeless and nonsensical, and may consider seeking costs against third-party promoters of such litigation.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 3 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.