Where a respondent abandons the subject matter of litigation for reasons unrelated to the merits (here, a political decision to abandon local government amalgamations), the applicant cannot obtain a costs order merely by pointing to the abandonment. The applicant must establish either that success was inevitable or that the respondent's conduct of the proceedings was unreasonable. Success in a related but factually distinguishable case does not establish inevitable success.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 26 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 26 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.