A sentencing judge dealing with multiple child pornography offences must assess the objective seriousness of each offence individually, not deal with them collectively. A bare reference to the totality principle without reasoning for the degree of accumulation constitutes appealable error. The comparative sentencing table at [80] provides a useful reference for practitioners in this area.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 14 later cases that cite this judgment.
4 of the 14 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.