Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Afu; R v Caleo (No 4)

[2017] NSWSC 1787

Supreme Court of NSW

View on CaseLaw

More

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Crime
2. › procedure
3. › joint or separate trials of accused
1. evidence in case of co-accused inadmissible in case of
1. accused may bolster
1. credibility of crucial witnesses
2. › capacity of jury directions to

Case Details

Citation[2017] NSWSC 1787

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by3

2018R v Afu; R v Caleo (No 13)NSWSC 222
2018R v Afu; R v Caleo (No 10)NSWSC 189
2018R v Afu; R v Caleo (No 5)NSWSC 184

Relies on4

2017R v Afu; R v Caleo (No 2)NSWSC 1781
2017R v Afu; R v Caleo (No 3)NSWSC 1782
2017R v Afu; R v CaleoNSWSC 1780
2004Regina v PhamNSWCCA 190

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works

R v Afu; R v Caleo (No 4) [2017] NSWSC 1787 — Procedure & Accused May Bolster — Barrister AI