Ahmad v Director of Public Prosecutions (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 204 — Specified Lump Sum Costs Orders & The General Rule — Barrister AI
← Back
Ahmad v Director of Public Prosecutions (No 2)
[2017] NSWSC 204
Supreme Court of NSW
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
View on CaseLaw
More
View on CaseLaw
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+1 more
Costs
›
specified lump sum costs orders
›
the discretion to
award costs in civil proceedings
›
the general rule
event
›
onus of displacing the general rule as to costs lies with the
defendant
›
held that the
Case Details
Citation
[2017] NSWSC 204
Court
NSWSC
Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2017] NSWSC 204
3 authorities it relies on
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2017
Relies on
3
2017
Ahmad v Director of Public Prosecutions
NSWSC 90
2014
Norfeld v Jones (No 2)
NSWSC 199
1998
Oshlack v Richmond River Council
HCA 11
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
