Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

National Australia Bank v Sayed (No. 9) [2017] NSWSC 389 — Pleadings — Barrister AI

National Australia Bank v Sayed (No. 9)

[2017] NSWSC 389

Supreme Court of NSW

View on CaseLaw

More

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Procedure
2. › pleadings
3. › amendment
4. › possession proceedings
5. › cross-claim by mortgagor for breach of mortgagee’s duties
6. › further application to amend cross-claim
7. › whether cross-claimant estopped from pleading further claims
8. › whether abuse of process
1. Procedure
2. › pleadings
3. › fraud
4. › need for proper particularisation

Case Details

Citation[2017] NSWSC 389

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by3

2020Sayed v National Australia BankNSWCA 334
2018National Australia Bank v Sayed (No. 12)NSWSC 283
2018National Australia Bank v Sayed (No. 10)NSWSC 108

Relies on10

2017National Australia Bank v Sayed (No. 8)NSWSC 89
2016National Australia Bank v Sayed (No. 6)NSWSC 1253
2016National Australia Bank v Sayed (No. 5)NSWSC 669
2015Tomlinson v Ramsey Food Processing Pty LimitedHCA 28
and 6 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works