The Hills Shire Council v Stankovic [2017] NSWSC 464 — Orders Sought & Opposed — Barrister AI
← Back
The Hills Shire Council v Stankovic
[2017] NSWSC 464
Supreme Court of NSW
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
View on CaseLaw
More
View on CaseLaw
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+2 more
PROCEDURE - Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW)
›
orders sought
opposed
›
whether the Council met the onus of establishing that Mr
Stankovic has frequently instituted
established
›
whether Court’s discretion to make orders should be
Case Details
Citation
[2017] NSWSC 464
Court
NSWSC
Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2017] NSWSC 464
32 authorities it relies on
1988
1994
2000
2006
2012
2017
Relies on
32
2017
Stankovic v The Hills Shire Council and Namul Pty Ltd
NSWCA 49
2016
The Attorney General for the State of New South Wales v Mohareb
NSWSC 1823
2016
Namul Pty Limited v The Hills Shire Council
NSWLEC 152
2016
Stankovic v State of New South Wales
NSWCA 168
and 28 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works