Lord v McMahon (No. 5) [2017] NSWSC 819 — Costs — Barrister AI
← Back
Lord v McMahon (No. 5)
[2017] NSWSC 819
Supreme Court of NSW
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+1 more
Costs
plaintiff partially successful in action for nuisance and trespass
defendant/cross-claimant unsuccessful on Cross-Claim for proprietary estoppel and for relief under the Encroachment of Buildings Act 1922
consideration of the appropriate order for costs to take account of the parties’ partial success and partial failure in the proceedings
Case Details
Citation
[2017] NSWSC 819
Court
NSWSC
Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2017] NSWSC 819
8 authorities it relies on
1988
1994
2000
2006
2012
2017
Relies on
8
2016
Lord v McMahon (No. 4)
NSWSC 1854
2016
Lord v McMahon (No. 3)
NSWSC 1686
2016
Lord v McMahon (No. 2)
NSWSC 1153
2016
Hancock v Rinehart (Costs)
NSWSC 11
and 4 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
