Practitioners acting for supervisees in contravention proceedings under the SSO Act (NT) must appreciate that the onus rests on the supervisee to positively demonstrate that revocation is not appropriate, and that failure to lead evidence or propose an alternative supervisory regime will be fatal to resisting a detention order.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 4 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.