The Queen v Dagger [2017] NTSC 19 — Expert Evidence & Coincidence Evidence — Barrister AI
← Back
The Queen v Dagger
[2017] NTSC 19
Supreme Court of the Northern Territory
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+3 more
Evidence
›
expert evidence
›
DNA evidence
›
whether expert was qualified to give an opinion about the number of contributors
›
whether expert evidence admissible
›
Uniform Evidence (National Uniform Evidence Legislation) Act, ss 76(1); 79(1)
EVIDENCE - tendency evidence
›
coincidence evidence
›
whether admissible to prove defendant involved in supply of illegal drugs
›
Uniform Evidence (National Uniform Evidence Legislation) Act, ss 55(1), 56(1), 97, 98 and 101(2)
Misuse of Drugs Act, ss 3(1), 3(6), 5(1) and 5(2)(b(iA)
Uniform Evidence (National Uniform Evidence Legislation) Act, ss 55(1), 56(1), 76(1), 79(1), 97, 98 and 101(2)
Case Details
Citation
[2017] NTSC 19
Court
NTSC
Jurisdiction
Northern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2017] NTSC 19
11 authorities it relies on
2001
2004
2007
2010
2013
2017
Relies on
11
2016
The Queen v Donald Grant
NTSC 54
2015
Tuite v The Queen
VSCA 148
2014
The Queen v Tuite
VSC 662
2014
Elomar v R; Hasan v R; Cheikho v R; Cheikho v R; Jamal v R
NSWCCA 303
and 7 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works