› Workers Rehabilitation and Compensation Act s 65
› Mere notice of existence of psychological sequela does not amount to acceptance of liability to pay compensation for loss of earning capacity as a result of the sequela
› Worker obliged to give notice of alleged incapacity as a result of a sequela under s 80
Workers’ Compensation
› Cancellation of compensation
› Validity of notice - Workers Rehabilitation and Compensation Act s 69
Administrative Law
› Judicial review
› Work Health Court NT
› Jurisdictional error
› Natural justice
› Failure to give adequate reasons
BANKRUPTCY - Action
› Effect of bankruptcy on
› Court action commenced by bankrupt before bankruptcy
› Whether stay of proceedings
› Whether action in respect of “personal injury or wrong”
› Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss 60(2), 60(4)
› Action under Workers Rehabilitation and Compensation Act s 65 for restoration of benefits for loss of earning capacity is an action in respect of a “personal injury or wrong”
Case Details
Citation[2017] NTSC 33
CourtNTSC
JurisdictionNorthern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.