The Queen v AF [2017] NTSC 60 — Mental Impairment & Relevant Considerations — Barrister AI
← Back
The Queen v AF
[2017] NTSC 60
Supreme Court of the Northern Territory
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+2 more
Criminal Law
›
Mental impairment
›
finding of not guilty by mental
impairment following plea of not guilty by mental impairment
consequences of finding
›
relevant considerations
›
finding that AF unlikely
to endanger himself or others
›
AF released unconditionally.
Case Details
Citation
[2017] NTSC 60
Court
NTSC
Jurisdiction
Northern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2017] NTSC 60
2 authorities it relies on
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Relies on
2
2013
The Queen v RFK
NTSC 40
2013
The Queen v Madrill
NTSC 23
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
