Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Perkins v Heath [2017] NTSC 74 — Criminal Law & Referred To — Barrister AI

Perkins v Heath

[2017] NTSC 74

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Appeal
2. › CRIMINAL LAW
3. › Appeal against sentence
4. › Suspended sentence
5. › Whether conditions of suspended unrelated to offending
6. › Whether conditions of suspended sentence must be solely for the purpose of rehabilitation of the offender
7. › Conditions imposed for a purpose specified in s 5(1) Sentencing Act 1995 (NT)
1. Appeal
2. › CRIMINAL LAW
3. › Appeal against sentence
4. › Whether sentence manifestly excessive
5. › Suspended sentence
6. › Curfew and electronic monitoring conditions for the entire two year supervision period of the suspended sentence manifestly excessive
1. Sentencing Act 1995 (NT), s 5(1), s 44(2)
1. Edmond and Moreen v The Queen [2017] NTCCA 9, applied

Case Details

Citation[2017] NTSC 74

CourtNTSC

JurisdictionNorthern Territory

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by2

2023Cumaiyi v TysonNTSC 29
and 1 more after sign-in

Relies on3

2016Garling v FirthNTSC 41
2014Phan v The State of Western AustraliaWASCA 144
2004R v S W BugmyNSWCCA 258

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works