Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Hampton [2017] NTSC 87 — Jurisdiction, Practice And Procedure — Barrister AI

R v Hampton

[2017] NTSC 87

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › Jurisdiction, practice and procedure
3. › Information, indictment or presentment
4. › Indictments
5. › Severance
6. › Multiple complainants
7. › Application for separate trials - Evidence of complaints cross-admissible as tendency evidence
8. › Application refused
9. › Criminal Code Act 1983 (NT) ss 341, 341A
1. Evidence
2. › Admissibility and relevance
3. › Tendency
4. › Probative value
5. › Whether significant probative value outweighs any prejudicial effect to defendant
6. › Whether probative value undermined by possibility of collusion
7. › Possibility that similarities in complainants’ evidence the result of contamination
8. › Whether similarities unduly elevate the probative value of the evidence
9. › Evidence admissible
10. › Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act 2011 (NT) ss 97, 101
1. Criminal Code Act 1983 (NT) ss 341, 341A
1. Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act 2011 (NT) ss 97, 101

Case Details

Citation[2017] NTSC 87

CourtNTSC

JurisdictionNorthern Territory

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 9 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by9

2019The Queen v GrahamNTSC 59
2017Krivosic v RNSWCCA 167
2011R v KoloamatangiNSWCCA 288
2006Vikramdeep Singh v Department of Public Prosecutions (NSW)NSWCCA 333
and 5 more after sign-in

Relies on1

2017Hughes v The QueenHCA 20

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works