Where a sentencing judge proceeds on an incorrect understanding of an offender's criminal history, the sentencing discretion is vitiated by error and the appellate court must exercise the discretion afresh. The imposition of the same head sentence on co-offenders with materially different roles and criminal histories may give rise to a justifiable sense of grievance under the parity principle, warranting appellate intervention even where the sentence is otherwise within range.
The full text is available to signed-in members.