R v GNN (2000) 78 SASR 293 does not prescribe a particular mandatory approach to directing juries on possession; each case turns on its own facts and the main requirement is to clearly explain what proof is required. Where directions clearly set out the elements of sole and joint possession and distinguish possession from mere acquiescence, it is not necessary for the trial judge to provide a catalogue of what is insufficient or to descend into fact-specific analysis of the evidence.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.
3 of the 4 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.