DJK v Tasmania [2017] TASCCA 17 — Appeal And New Trial & Aust Dig Criminal Law [3478] — Barrister AI
← Back
DJK v Tasmania
[2017] TASCCA 17
Court of Criminal Appeal of Tasmania
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+5 more
Criminal Law
›
Appeal and new trial
›
Particular grounds of appeal
›
Inconsistent verdicts
›
Appellant convicted of rape but acquitted of aggravated sexual assault
›
Incidents separated in time
›
Stronger evidence as to rape.
MacKenzie v The Queen (1996) 190 CLR 348, referred to.
Aust Dig Criminal Law [3478]
Criminal Law
›
Appeal and new trial
›
Fresh evidence
›
Materiality and cogency
›
Other cases
›
Rape
›
Potential defence witness not called at trial.
Case Details
Citation
[2017] TASCCA 17
Court
TASCCA
Jurisdiction
Tasmania
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2017] TASCCA 17
16 authorities it relies on
1974
1983
1992
2001
2010
2017
Relies on
16
2016
The Queen v Baden-Clay
HCA 35
2012
Wood v R
NSWCCA 21
2008
Causevic v R
NSWCCA 238
2006
Livermore v R
NSWCCA 334
and 12 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
