Tasmania v Joseph

[2017] TASSC 23

Supreme Court of Tasmania

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Criminal Law
2. › Sentence
3. › Sentencing orders
4. › Non-custodial orders
5. › Other types of order
6. › Drug treatment order
7. › Preconditions to making a drug treatment order.
1. De Simoni v The Queen (1981) 124 CLR 383; R v Ireland and Burstow [1997] UKHL 34; [1998] AC 147; R v Chan-Fook [1993] EWCA Crim 1; [1994] 1 WLR 689, 2 All ER 552; W v M [1996] QCA 328; R v Aubrey [2012] NSWCCA 254; Bartel v State of Tasmania [2016] TASCCA 18; Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 167 CLR 465.
1. Sentencing Act 1997 (Tas), Pt 3, s 27B.
1. Aust Dig Criminal Law [3409]

Citation[2017] TASSC 23

CourtTASSC

JurisdictionTasmania

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Already have an account? Sign in