Smith v Kirkham [2017] TASSC 3 — Appeal And New Trial & Aust Dig Criminal Law [3521] — Barrister AI
← Back
Smith v Kirkham
[2017] TASSC 3
Supreme Court of Tasmania
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Criminal Law
›
Appeal and new trial
›
Appeal against sentence
›
Grounds for interference
›
Sentence manifestly excessive or inadequate
›
Impact of intellectual deficits of offender on sentence
›
Application of totality principle.
Director of Public Prosecutions (Acting) v CBF [2016] TASCCA 1; Mill v The Queen [1988] HCA 70; (1988) 166 CLR 59, referred to.
Aust Dig Criminal Law [3521]
Case Details
Citation
[2017] TASSC 3
Court
TASSC
Jurisdiction
Tasmania
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2017] TASSC 3
16 authorities it relies on
1936
1952
1968
1984
2000
2017
Relies on
16
2011
Muldrock v The Queen
HCA 39
2011
Romero v The Queen
VSCA 45
2010
Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen
HCA 45
2007
R v Verdins; R v Buckley; R v Vo
VSCA 102
and 12 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
