Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Lawsen v Jensen [2017] TASSC 34 — Application To Dispense With Jury — Barrister AI

Lawsen v Jensen

[2017] TASSC 34

Supreme Court of Tasmania

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Entitlement to Trial by Jury
2. › Application to dispense with jury
3. › Power to order trial without jury
4. › Relevant considerations
5. › Prolonged examination of documents
6. › Scientific investigation
7. › Not convenient for a jury to do
8. › Order that the trial be tried without a jury.
1. Supreme Court Rules 2000 (Tas) rr557, 558.
1. McBride v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 10, followed.
1. Aust Dig Jury [14]

Case Details

Citation[2017] TASSC 34

CourtTASSC

JurisdictionTasmania

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Relies on7

2012Matthews v SPI Electricity Pty Ltd; SPI Electricity Pty Ltd v United Services Corporation Limited (Ruling No 8)VSC 318
2011Trevor Roller Shutter Service Pty Ltd v CroweVSCA 16
2010Gunston v Davies Brothers Pty Ltd & OrsTASSC 65
2009McBride v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd & AnorNSWSC 10
and 3 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works